Akhbar Al-Youmem Today's news Azmi Bishara and the Arab Trouver News News source – The new Arab with the details of the news of Azmi Bishara and the Arab World's Thinking:
Azimi Bishara is well-known in Poland, parliamentary and academia, before he settled in Doha. His fame grew up after the establishment of the Arab Center for Research and Study Studies, the Doma Institute for Postgraduate Studies, some magazines and the management of intellectual and political seminars. . Before the dialogue with Le Monde, he did not respond to the press interviews, but Palestinian and Arab issues emerged and called him. The idea here includes political risks (the trade of the century and the transformation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel) and the promotion of populist rights-wing policies in the developed world, rejecting the rights of the prohibited classes and The rights of the people, especially the rights of the Palestinians. At the same time, the West supports dictators and tyranny in the Arab world and other growth, which needs intellectual confrontation. In a dialogue with the Europeans, it is a report of a well-known cleaner, including the rejection of the superpowers policies in marginalizing the Palestinian. Foundation, supporting dictatorships and leaving the regimes. , Which he spoke by criticizing US. It. President Barack Obama's policies to Syria and the Arab revolutions.
Azmi Bishara is managing money for both the Hamas and Fatah movements, which control the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. It calls for the re-activation of the plao, the restoration of the political role of the Palestinian people, and pressure on the two organizations to end the division. The situation in Palestine requires that Fatha and Hamas are bypass in new movements and a new organization that represents the new stage that the situation is stabilized after the Oslo agreement and after the big decline of all components of the PLO.
The Arab world and the secularization of the Islamists
Azimya vision is the gospel of the European and American vision of "the priority of stability in the Middle East" – the support of dictatorial and sectarian regimes, the sacrifice of peoples and their revolutions. If
|"The problem with Bishara is in full support of the Arab revolutions, and this is a challenge that has been taken away from all regions"|
The dialogue function is to refer to this issue, ie to expose Western policies, and to establish the decline of fraternities and democracy, not only in the Arab world, but also in Europe and America. Criticized the western vision of the East as its constituency, and the sectarian struggle (Sunni and Shia) is not new, it always appears in its own words, Azmy Bishara says, "It is sectarianism that produces sectors, not the other way Around. "What React Sectarianism and Sectors, That it is the fact that re-produces the sectors, and so the regimes, intensified by the West to settle themselves, are creating sectarianism, the cause of the conflicts and the politicization of identity.
The interpreters Benjamin Bart tried to refer to the role of Bishara in Arab politics, specifically revolutionary, and the response was centered on the role of intellectual in politics. So, the viewer may not think of ideas. The importance of thinking and its impact is connected with the specific appeals of the cultured person. The people's supervision of the centers and the support of the media institutions are actions that come in the framework of the political and revolutionary struggle. There is something that Everyone is concerned about revolutions and change in the Arab world. (Defamation in the role of Azmi Bishara) in all this?
The problem with Azmi Bishara is quite a bit of the revolutions, which is a problem that has really involved all the reams. Is this an Arab regime that has not trembled with the revolutions and went through the time of their death? A special relationship between BESTHARA (the intellectual intellectuals of the revolutions), as described in the portrait, and the "Muslim Brotherhood," as if they were the manufacture of these, and that the only one who demands involvement in political action. The Muslim Brotherhood is an old organization in the Arab world, and regardless of the debate that does not stop as the establishment and employment of the group and its branches in all Arab countries and others, it is a serious and unconfirmed Discussion about how to participate in political life, especially after 2011, is about the need to change their attitude and opinions about the concept of a religious state or what it does, and to adhere to the concept of a modern state based On Citizenship and Human Rights, which is the state that deviates from politics entirely, but at the same time guarantees the political participation of all political forces, Azmi Bishara Nasso published the many people discussing the issue, and the need to divide the process of political , Which is to become the "Muslim Brotherhood" democratic act, and get rid of every brotherhood of the state and tidenha, and become a political party. The issue is referred to the media, which is politically motivated, and has a full choice in religious affairs, beliefs and others, but also to guarantee the other freedom of choice, in terms of faith, disbelief, agnosticism and others .
There is more than one question that the interlocutors have tried that Azmi Bishara's position on a state
|"Exact security control over any activities related to universities, research, publishing and culture in the Arab world"|
Qatar, and did not drop people, was his answer that he is a visitor, swap, and will not revolutionize a stable country, but also said the need to lead some reforms. He said that if the Katai people would appear to prove his answer was clear and precise, he would definitely support him, that he would stand with the Qatar people as he did with the other Arab peoples. Ask: Have these revitalizations artisticized or have they found it for objective reasons? The issue is here: how will a revolution emerge from nothingness in Qatar? This is a rudimentary debate, meaning only of the malicious gates and the fake space.
"I prefer the reforms to the revolution, it's safe," says Azmy Bishara. This is followed by revolutions that lead to tyranny. If the reformist way is preferred, the long-term problem solving, reflecting the attitude of the peoples also, the pain of shriveling about greats is so straightforward to live with death, thus extending with extreme embarrassment, exploded in 2011? And then what will the viewer do? There are two options: standing with regimes or with people. Azimi Bishara simply chose the BA at the revolution for the regimes and democracy, and all the goals that allow a modern transition from the Arab countries.
"The revolutions have built the seeds of change, and the change will come through reforms, revolutions, economic crises or war, and the alternatives will be ready, and it will be less naive." This is what Bishara says, if the fact does not return to early 2011, and he did not explain the reasons for this accurately, because of the technical aspect of the dialogue, but the number of factors as above. If these revolutions are available, the remnants they represent and the interests of the people will disappear again. The idea leads the reader to a great deal of error in which many writers are falling, and they share the spirit of defeat and say that it's done forever (the harsh winter, the autumn of revolutions, the victory of the counterrevolution). Yes, the revolutions did not win, and they achieved the great goals they wanted (democracy, social justice and public liberties). And the regime did not, and could no longer carry comprehensive reforms, their (economic) crises would inevitably reproduce the revolutions. In this context, neo-liberal policies, which are the root cause of the revolutions, could be referred to the destruction of industry and agriculture, which resulted in a huge mass of unemployed people, the decline of the middle class and The collapse of their economic and social status. If the "seeds of change" are planted, people will not be silenced again and for a long time.
He did not settle in Syria and tried before his last county in Qatar to restore ties between Palestinians.
|"Bishara: Our opposition locks a" democratic culture "|
The annihilation territory in 1948 and the Arabs of the rest of the Arab countries. The act was a breach of Israel and Arab cavernants at the same time. Israel will prevent this, and the regulations prevent this, and the reason is the same argument, that is, dealing with the enemy. In any case, Bishara calculates what he plans for Qatar as he has praised a culture and media kingdom, not just platforms. If the media aspect is determined in support of the revolutions and the dismantling of Arab issues, especially the Syrian one, the cultural aspect is the basis. No consideration of the status of Arab universities, and to compare it with a gospel work of culture will be in favor of the institute of studies and others. Qatar will benefit from the reputation of this man and everything he builds on his territory, but the question is where cultural projects allow intellectuals in our Arab world? It can be associated with the absence of cultural monuments, but the base is first connected to tyranny, and to prevent the tyranny any cultural and educational projects capable of dismantling the Arab reality. For this, producing Arab minds is capable of doing so. Here is the critical issue. How do we shape modern methods, visions and policies, and give young people the opportunity to give thinkers, researchers, analysts, and all fields?
There is no serious Arab research centers, and our universities, especially in the fields of humanity and literature, are not preoccupied with this issue, and every creativity and thinking and analyst graduated from it, it was connected to it, its efforts and Potential. I remember that the Syrian regime did not allow a project initiated by Sadik Jalal Al-Azm in the mid-1990s. It was about the institution of cultural weeks at the University of Damascus, the project was closed. The role of Esssam Al-Zayim, one of the most important Arab minds in the economy, was also marginalized. , As is dealing with it, marginalization and accusation of corruption!
Culture, education and literature are areas that need a lot of care, support and funding, working in these areas requires a lot of time to be innovative, which is ignored. The budgets of culture and education are the lowest among the rest of the budgets. . As such, Azmi Bishara is entitled to say that Qatar has provided him with a great opportunity for cultural, educational and scientific work.
Criticism and thought
The Arab's idea of Arab critique, and the Arab thought itself, lead to the saying that the same idea is in a controversy, not criticized alone, why does the talker relax to criticize, and what Christ comes in the most growing and growing Others? Why not criticize the text and references first, and the historical context that found it second.
|"How can we reproduce a national Arab project, and it is not hostile to the rest of the nationalities?"|
In other words, what is criticism not first and secondly crucial? There can be a relationship between criticism and democracy, when it is realized, the view breaks away from many constraints, it looks at all its currencies as it is, and without any relation with the entry of policymaticitis. So, thought to be independent and capable of learning, and even of politics. But in a free and conversational way, away from the spirit of rejection and pre-faith, our universities are in the work of the Arab authorities, as the latter despotism, as well as universities, there is no place for freedom of mind and research and thinking And challenging. There is also a state of thought in Arab societies, in which the idea of the other is gone, and only a parish is attended by the duty of obedience, each other is a parish, not a citizen and equal to the others.
Revolutions are a great opportunity to learn, to think, to recognize the others, the regime severely suppressed, but they do not differ as above. Opposition, as Azmi Bishara says, lacks a "democratic culture," is sure that the Arab world's problems become more and more complicated. In stability, but there will be revolutions coming, not just appearances here and there.
The critic should now focus on dismantling the reality of the 2011 revolution, which did not win, and give special importance to the crises of the Arab social structure and the Arab authorities, and the theory of the future revolutions. Reading from the fact, its interpretation and its perspective will contribute to the dissemination of new visions, ideas and policies. How can the state be secular, non-anti-religious, and how the Islamic and non-Islamic political parties are religious rather religious, how can a national arab project produce, non-hostile to the rest of the nationalities? Revolutions are both national and national. As well as the Arabs are part of the globalized world, it is not a break with it, despite the importance of cutting for national development, and include the establishment of a direct relationship, not retrieve, isolation, and degeneration. In addition to the previous political aspect, it is necessary to examine carefully the conditions of economics, the world and the Arab world, how can non-dependent and basic relations be established with developed economies, is it possible and maybe the experiences of South Korea and China and others? Dependency and motivation to industry, and the general development of our company.
The latest idea of this article is the criticism of the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies (ACSRM) and its analysis of the latest developments in the Arab world, this is a real distinction for the culture and media issue that was created and managed by 2007 Azmi Bishara.
Loma News Search Engine News and Loma News Leave Its Full Responsibility For The News Of The News Today's News Azmi Bishara And The Chain of the Arab Chick News Link Linked To The News In Your Place
אָדער בילדער, אָבער איז די פֿאַראַנטוואָרטלעכקייט פון דער אָריגינעל אַרויסגעבער פון די נייַעס און די מקור פון די נייַ אַראַבער ווי דער אָריגינעל אַרויסגעבער טראגט דעם דרוקרעכט און אינטעלעקטואַל פאַרמאָג רעכט פון די נייַעס.אין דעם רעפּאָרט איז אויטאָמאַטיש טראַנספערד און אויב איר האָבן די נייַעס און ווילן צו ויסמעקן אָדער אַראָפּרעכענען ביטע אָפּשיקן צו די אָריגינעל מקור פון די נייַעס ערשטער און דעמאָלט שיקן אונדז צו ויסמעקן די נייַעס