Why is the spread of fear in the fight against HIV and AIDS toxic?


More author

A number of steps have been taken in the pandemic of HIV and AIDS since 1984, when the first case was reported in Kenya.

By creating consciousness, the state no longer knows about this disease. Many people know their propagation and control mechanisms.

In addition, antiretroviral viruses now reach millions of people, while preventing mother-to-child transmission has helped reduce infections in children.

However, profits registered over the years are gradually emptied by a disease-related stigma. Although some have overcome a stigmatizing mark, many others live in denial.

In spite of this fact, organizations and volunteers who are facing HIV campaigns are not only ordinary in their approach, but also have no ability to deal with such a sensitive topic.

I am not sure whether HIV prevalence policies are designed to spread fear or to inform and provide solutions, because the negative perception approach is a toxic pill that creates only cracked efforts.

First, sexual intimacy is a choice. But it's a ruthlessness that exposes sexual behavior and choices that puts the risk at risk.

Once again, the presence of more friendly options, such as the use of a condom, excites irresponsible behaviors among sexually active people.

Changes in behavior and sound choices are essential in eliminating risky business.

HIV testing is voluntary in line with the 2009 Prevention and Control of HIV / AIDS Prevention and Control Act. In addition to ensuring privacy and confidentiality, patients are provided with the protection of those infected against discrimination.

While in this proposal of strategies, such as systems of management partners, they have no clarity about their implementation within the so-called network, without violating the constitutional provisions.

In addition, this approach could lead to the expansion of network networks if it was too early to disclose.

Spiral prevalence in age groups is due to unverified political approaches. Communication with slim groups and targeting only facilitate the prevalence of the transition to another group that they feel safer.

Public perception is vital in social endeavors. If and when it comes to origin, their influence must be evaluated to avoid boomerangs.

By the way, sexuality is complicated and difficult mechanized. The only way out of the moving strategy is for less risky decisions by formulating policy strategies that offer solutions and do not think about fear. Fear of HIV infection is unfounded.

Once again, there is a general belief that infected persons can only be dry if health is unsuccessful, and therefore, additional therapeutic themes with the power that has been accepted into the topic of sexuality need to be further digested.

Let's tackle gray areas that offer refuge to cynics. Among them is the issue of discrepancy, confidentiality between the doctor and the patient, ecclesiastical statements and miracles, and so on.

Source link