[ad_1]
Solo –
The victim's father Eko Prasetio, Suharto, suddenly came to the defendant Iwan Adranacus, the head of the paint factory, who was awaiting trial. Suharto accepted, forgiven, and said that he died of Eko Prasetio's son.
"I was honest," said Suharto with a stinging voice, while Iwan clashed at the Surakarta PN courtroom on Tuesday (June 11, 2013).
While Iwan, who was visibly shocked, turned to Suharto, he apologized to Suhart.
"I'm sorry," he said.
Iwan then moved to the prison chamber and started the trial. This opening session starts with the agenda of the hearing of prosecutors by the state prosecutor.
This opening session starts with the agenda of the hearing of prosecutors by the state prosecutor.
The prosecutor said that the three articles were used to destroy Iwan Adranacus. First, Article 338 of the Criminal Code of Murder.
"The victim Eko Prasetio died with a state of sprinkled head due to blunt objects according to the results of the examination after his death," Prosecutor Titiek Mariyani said.
The indictment is continued by reading the affiliate article which Iwan closed with Article 351, paragraph 1 of the Penal Code of Conduct, and Article 311, paragraph 5, of Law no. 22 of 2009 on traffic.
"Eco Prasetio's victim suffered a fracture of more than one city and suffered damage to the brain tissue and died due to a post-mortem examination," prosecutor Satriawan Sulaksono said.
Iwan Adranacus did not make any allegations about the charges.
In addition to the accelerated procedure, legal adviser Iwan argued that he would later refuse to accuse the evidence on the agenda.
"Later, in the case of evidence, we can consider whether it is true that the alleged articles match the facts of the trial and the facts on the ground," said lawyer Iwan Adranacus, Joko Haryadi.
(bai / sip)
<! –
->
Source link
