Why U.S. Women in the marathon are dominated by men?



Last month, he brought off news for American competitors: after an operation on the left Achilles, Galen Rupp said that "there was no chance" that he would compete in the marathon next spring. Disregarding some kind of divine intervention, this actually means that there is no chance that we will see the American man who will receive the Boston Marathon this year. If you love or hate him, Rupp is currently unmatched among the American marathons and the only one capable of competing with the best in the world. Anyone who asks that this dominion should only be viewed on the qualification list for the 2020 Olympics, where the fastest marathon event in the United States has been recorded since September 1, 2017. Rupp was at the top of the list thanking 2:06:07 that he ran in Prague last May. Meanwhile, Tim Ritchie's 2:11:55, set at last year's California International Marathon, is by far the second. It's not a difference in talent – it's an abyss.

Meanwhile, as you may have heard, American women have talent in abundance. There were several articles in the article, which thanks to stars like Shalane Flanagan, Amy Cragg, Jordan Hasay, Des Linden and Molly Huddle, the American woman's distance is deeper than ever. Flanagan, Linden and Huddle attended the last weekend of the New York City Marathon race, which for some showed the current mismatch between elite men and women in that country.

"The recent American female performance is against men," TimeLindsay Crouse wrote after Sunday's game. "Since 2014, the American man, besides Galen Rupp, did not have a marathon for less than 2 hours 10 minutes, which is actually equivalent to a draw at 2: 30. This year, only in New York, four American women broke 2:30. No American man won the first five; American women are by far two, "Crouse added.

In the equity, both the male and female races in New York saw four Americans in the top ten. But, as LetsRun.com wrote, statistics do not mean too much when about half of the elite fields are made up of American runners. Most of the American races will be disproportionately lined up with local athletes, so times can end up being a more useful metrics for assessing the competitiveness of our top competitors. If we use the 2:10 mark as a barometer, what does this tell us about the status of a professional male marathon in this country?

I'm not the first person to ask this question. Writing for Runner's WorldSarah Lorge Butler recently published an article entitled "Where Are All Sub-2: 10 American Marathoners?"

In his work, Butler points out that most of the fastest American marathons tend to compete in the United States, mainly because events such as New York City and Boston Marathons offer sporting events for US athletes. From New York and Boston they are helpless and have difficult courses, these races do not necessarily bring urgent times.

But, although there is certainly some truth in this regard, it is not clear why it would not be the same for American women who are better than their male counterparts. In 2017, no American man broke the first 100 fastest marathon matches for the year, while five American women.

When I asked David Monti, editor and publisher of news and results of the Race Weekly Week, asked why American women are better than men, he pointed to two important factors. The marathon is still a relatively "new" event in the women's professional circle. This was added only as an Olympic event in 1984. Partly, for the last decade, much has been learned about how women should train the marathon. As with women who deal with specific exercise in general, there is a lot of catch.

Per Monti: "Women are engaged in transporting miles and training that they would not give 10 years ago." American women may still find out what they are capable of surviving more than 26.2 miles. Then there's the competition. Without taking anything far from the achievements of Flanagan, Linden and co., Monti stresses that "the very number of men trying to compete in a marathon at the global level is still much larger than the number of women", so it is more difficult for them Men in the US are competitive.

Of course, as illustrated by the recent world record, carried out by Eliud Kipchoge from the World Record 2:01:39, the bar is currently very high. Only 17 American men have ever run a marathon 2:10 or faster, and since 2000 only nine.

It's not a push against men from the US, but rather a warning that we have never had a sub-2: 10 guys in droves. I hate to break all the illusions, but the sub-2: 10 always reached the ceiling, which could be achieved for American men. (For what is worth, last month, Cam Levins became the first Canadian to break 2:10 when he set a national record in the first marathon.) In the last two decades, the brand has become much less impressive, the top East African competitors took the world record of marathons in the stratosphere. While the US Marathon record Khalid Khannouchi (2:05:38) dates back to 2002, in the last ten years 48 of the 50 fastest marathons have ever taken place. And each of them was led by someone from Kenya or Ethiopia.

So it may be less that the American men are falling and that the top Kenyans are undoubtedly good. It's not exactly a puzzling insight, but it says when it suddenly scratches our heads over why the United States does not create a time charter in the marathon; the same could be said about American performances in the half marathon or 10K. (Perhaps we could learn something from Japan, a nation enthusiastic about the competition that, in anticipation of the Olympic Games in Tokyo in 2020, recently created a multitude of athletes under 2:10, thanks to the corporate sponsorship system.

Of course, American men are not the only ones who have many reasons to make up for their Kenyan "rivals." Everyone who watched Mary Keitany explosion 66:58 for his second half, split on Sunday in New York, knows this, which is at the top of his game, the best Kenyan runners are still inviolable.

"I have no physical ability to have an answer to that," said Flanagan during a press conference after the match in response to the wicked second half of Keitany. And Flanagan had a wonderful match. Although she did not defend her title, Flanagan was reunited again on Sunday, fighting against the third and best American honor.

On the men's side, Jared Ward was the best American Olympic player in 2016, which finished six years. Then Ward went to Instagram and pushed against the fact that American men are not currently bringing marathons.

"The skeptics say that we have Rupp and then no one else. I disagree. While Rupp is at a different level, we have guys closer to what the clock said," Ward wrote before impressing the talents of other NYC competitors such as Shadrack Biwott (who finished 9th place) and Scott Fauble (7th).

"The race for the Olympic team will be a competition with friends and friends. I do not know who will be in this team, but when we send 3 guys to Tokyo, they will be good," added Ward.

Time will tell. In the meantime, Ward has all the reasons for optimism. After all, his second half, split on Sunday, was only a second slower than Keitany's.


Source link