Low notch? Stomach? What the latest dietary studies tell us – Stettler is independent


Bacon and black coffee for breakfast, or oatmeal and bananas?

If you're planning to try to lose weight in 2019, you & # 39; Be sure to find a fierce debate online and between friends and family about how best to do it. It seems like everyone has an opinion, and new fads emerge every year.

Two major studies last year gave more fuel for a major polarizing theme – the role of the Carbs game to make us fat. These studies gave scientists some clues, but like other nutrition studies, they can't say which diet – if any – is best for everyone.

That's not going to satisfy people who want black-and-white answers, but nutrition research is extremely difficult and even the most respected studies come with great coffee mugs. People are so different that it's all but impossible to conduct studies that show what really works over long periods of time.

Before embarking on a weight loss plan for the new year, some of them studied last year.

Less dent, less point?

It is no longer called the Atkins Diet, but the low-carb school of dieting is enjoying a comeback. The idea is that the refined carbohydrates in foods like white bread are quickly converted into sugar in our bodies, leading to energy swings and starvation.

By cutting carbs, the claim is that weight loss will be easier because your body will lose fat when it comes to feeling less hungry. A recent study seems to offer more support for low-carb proponents. However, like many studies, it has been tried to understand just one tear of the body.

The study, led by an author of books promoting low-carb diets, considered whether varying carb levels could affect the body's energy consumption. Among 164 participants, it was found that low-carb diets burn more whole calories than high-carb diets.

The study did not say people lost more weight on a low-carb diet – and did not try to measure that. Meals and snacks are tightly controlled and continually adjusted so that all wheat remains stable.

David Ludwig, a lead author of the paper and researcher at Boston Children's Hospital, said that losing limbs may make it easier for people to keep weight off once they have lost weight. He said the approach might be better for diabetes or diabetes.

Ludwig noticed, the study is not intended to test long-term sound effects or real-world scenarios that people make their own food. The findings also need to be replicated to be validated, he said.

Caroline Auchan of the Boston University School of Medicine said the findings were interesting for scientific community, but that they should not be taken as a guide for the average person looking for weight.

Do I avoid fat to be skinny?

For years, men are advised to curb fats, which are found in foods containing meat, nuts, eggs, butter and oil. Cutting fat is seen as a way to control weight, because a fat of fat has twice as many calories as the same carbs or protein.

Many say the advice has the opposite effect by giving us permission to digest fat-free cookies, cakes and other foods that are full of refined carbs and sugars, as determined by our tadlines again.

Nutrition experts gradually moved away from blanket recommendations to limit weight loss fats. Fats are essential for absorbing important nutrients and can help us feel full. That doesn't mean you have to rely on steak in butter to be healthy.

Bruce Y. Lee, an international health professor at Johns Hopkins, said the lessons learned from the anti-fat fad should be applied to the anti-notch thread: do not take advice.

"There is a continuous look for an easy way out," Li said.

So what's better?

Another major study this year past found low-carb diets and low-fat diets are about as effective as weight loss. Results are linked by individuals, but after one year, people in both groups shed an average of £ 12-13.

The author noted the findings did not believe in the Lowwigh low-carb study. Instead, they recommend there may be some flexibility in the ways we can lose weight. Participants in both groups were encouraged to focus on minimally processed foods such as home-made and meat-based products. Everyone was advised to limit added sugar and refined flour.

"If you got that foundation right, for many, would be a huge change," said Christopher Gardner of Stanford University and one of the study's authors.

Limiting processed foods may improve the diet by cutting down on overall calories, but still leaving people preferences. That's important, because for a diet to be effective, a person should be able to stick to him. A breakfast of fruit and oatmeal can be a filling for one person, but leave soon after.

Gardner notes the study also has its limitations, too. Participants are not controlled. People are unfolding on how to achieve a low-carb or low-fat diet in regular meetings with dieticians who may have provided dietary support.

So, what works?

In short, you can probably lose weight by eating only raw foods, or go vegan, or cut out gluten, or another diet plan that catches your eye. But what works for you over the long term is a different question.

Zhaoping Li, Director of Clinical Diet Division at the University of California, Los Angeles, says there is no set of guidelines that help everyone lose weight and keep it off. It's what dieting often fails – they don't factor into account the many reasons that drive us to eat what we do.

To help people lose weight, they examine their patients' eating and physical activity routines to identify improvements people will be able to live with.

"What sticks is that matter," Li said.

Candice Choi, The Associated Press

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Source link