Sydney-based UGG boot-maker loses legal battle over trademark naming right



[ad_1]

Australian UGG boot manufacturer Eddie Oygur has suffered a $ 643,000 loss in his "Dud Against Goliath" legal action against a major US dollar. There. Footwear and clothing company.

A jury in Chicago on Friday found Mr Ougur's business, Sydney-based Australian leather, deliberately infringing a trademark registered to California-based decorators by selling UGG boots online to customers in the United States.

After a four-day trial, Mr Uygur was ordered to pay $ 643,000 in statutory damages for statutory damages, and he had to pay millions more for legal costs.

190511 ugg boots legal challenge Australian leather news world
An Australian UGG bootmaker has lost a legal battle over the use of the term & # 39; And has already ordered more than $ 643,000. (PR IMAGE)

Dockers generate more than $ 1.4 million in annual sales of its UGG brands.

Mr Oygur argued "Ugg" is a generic term originating in Australia from the 1960s surfing community.

"It was a cruel blow," Australian lawyer and former Senator Nic Xenofon, who is in Chicago, supports Mr Ougur, told AAP.

"Everything he did in Australia for over 40 years has come to this."

Dockers acquired the Ugg Australia trademark in 1995.

"Deckers" products are widely accepted by the public and are popularly popular, as demonstrated by over $ 1 billion in annual sales, "Deckers wrote in its complaint to the US District Court.

"The Ugg brand is a well-known marketplace."

Mr Xenofon said Mr Uygur was "devastated and defiant" after the verdict and hoped Australian public, Prime Minister Scott Morris and Labor Leader Bill Shorten would back the businessman's plan to appeal.

190511 Ugg Boots Australia Trademark Legal Battle USA California News World
Australian lawyer and former Senator Nic Xenofon was a standard supporter of the Australian firm over the legal firm. (9news)

"It's not just a devastating blow to Eddie Oggur and Australia, there's a devastating blow to Australian jobs," Xenophon said.

"The term uGG should never have been branded.

"It is a generic term that should have been protected by Australian governments in the past.

190511 Ugg Boots Australia Trademark Legal Battle USA California News World
It is afraid of the cost of damages, as well as the statutory costs of the Australian leather industry, now stacks. (9news)

"As disappointed as the verdict is, which was incredibly disappointing, the Australian government has failed to stand for Eddie by providing him with the legal assistance he wants to fight the case.

"Eddie and his tiny company have already done all this on their own."

© AAP 2019

[ad_2]
Source link