[ad_1]
Women and girls are less likely to be seen as seduced to british tasks, researchers have found, in the last study to shed light on gender liberals.
Female students are better at school and are more likely to go to university than their male peers. However, the last study reveals that the females are insecure insecurely inferior, and such prädudices are not present only in adults of both sex, but also in children.
Dr. Andrei Simpyan, a member of the research, from New York University, said that the study indicated that people had come to the stereotypes that they were helping to explain women submissive in many fields as a high IG, including science And technology.
It also provides insight into what climates of gender bias when hiring for jobs are so hot debated. "If [the] The referral process is also approved, even if the final decision is based on merit, you still have a decision on the bases of candidates who do not have as many women as it should have given their competitors, "said Kimpiian.
Writing in the journalist American Psychologist, Cimpian and colleagues report how they conducted an experiment, first on a group of just under 350 participants and then on about 800 people.
Participants were asked to read a position description and then advise two people to know the position. While helping each group to get involved, it is said that the work needs skills such as "consistent effort," the other helps give a job description describing the need for intelligence.
The team found similar patterns for both the smaller and larger group of participants, with women as likely as people to be referred to the job requiring traits such as "consistent effort", but less likely than people to be referred to as Intelligence is Were specified.
With the results of the two groups boiled, the team found women receiving 43.5% of referrals for the "Brini" work – with the odds of being referred to a job 25.3% worse than when traits such as IQ are not mentioned. "Both men and women are less likely to recommend a woman for the brilliance that works like the dull work," Cimpian said.
In another experiment, the team asked 192 children aged between five and seven to study two new games and then gather three teammates from photos of unknown boys and girls. While the children are told to just choose who they would like, the other half were told participants needed to be very smart.
The results show that in both cases girls prefer to choose girls and boys to choose boys – but for their third choice, the likelihood of picking up a female trimmet dropped when the game was described as being "really, really smart" children.
Cimpian has the study backed up previous work showing children believe boys are more talented but girls do better in school because they work hard. "Kids are not born with the idea – we are still in the process of figuring out exactly where it comes from," he said, adding that teachers, the media and parents might all be involved.
However, the authors admit there are limitations to the latest study – including the hypothetical scenarios.
Angela Saini, the author of Inferior, said guilder Stereotypes were absorbed by an early age. "It's just so bad, it starts from the second you are born," she said.
His "Genius" could be seen as a male traumatic event because history was taught to involve male "unique genius" figures – which have more opportunities than women to engage in intellectual work, and are often supported by annex breaking women.
Lady Athena Donald, a professor of experimental physics at the University of Cambridge, described the widespread practice against women as dispiring. "[This study] Should be a wake-up call to our society to change our thinking and how we pass on the allegations in our daily lives to the next generation, "she said.
Source link
