After the failure of the 2×1, Rosenkrants asked to be "independent even of his own convictions" – 04/12/2018

On one of the hottest days since its arrival the top of the yard, Carlos Rosenkrants Defended his vote yesterday In this case, "Baldala", in which he was left alone in front of his colleagues at the site who rejected the application of the controversial 2×1 to a man convicted of crimes against humanity during illegal exploitation. The judge warned that "the National Court of Justice and the National Judicial Power must be improved and must be urgently needed." "

"It's about to renew the judicial culture, it is that there are no strong judges, but judging with authority," he argued. "And we will never have authority if we do not act responsibly. The idea of ​​independence required to be independent of our own Moral, ideological and political convictions " Declares Rosenkrants, in a clear estimate of his own vote. "The ideal of independence requires dispensing with what belief is morally, politically or ideally desirable to decide solely on the basis of which one believes is legally correct." In the case of doubt, the judge clarified that he was going to offer an "autobiographical example," and recalled that last year, following the decision of the court that benefits the 2×1 to another Repressor named Luis Mouana, it is "Ann Extended social rehabilitation response, which is in my opinion, is the fact that the presence of people in the streets testifies to the fact that we all believe in nevermore to barbarism, but at the moment I have believed, and I always believe that the commitment is expressed in never Again can Do not put yourself in any way and at any cost. Because no way is respected of the law and the Constitution, "he concluded.

Rosenkranz then referred to the swift sanction in the Congress of an "explanatory" law that left 2×1 offenders from crimes against humanity and that because of the law yesterday "The rest of my colleagues decided that the 2×1 did not apply to the crimes . I voted in dissent because in my opinion the law is unconstitutional Because it violated the principle of the non-retroactivity of the most burdensome criminal law. It was not easy for me to decide whether I was doing this day, "said the judge, before an udley from the ministers, governors, judges and procurators who listened to him in the festivals.

As I did before Clarin In a recent interview, Rosenkrantz has declared his work with Raul Alfonsin and Jurist Carlos Nino, "The Intellectual Father of Human Rights in Argentina." "But I have to create a clear difference between my personality and my role as a Judge." Judicial independence is the only way to be true to the Constitution, and it is the only way to achieve progress, justice and welfare. From our navigation, no matter how stormy these waters are, "he concluded. The cork of controversy is still burning.

Source link